What You Need to Know About Director ID’s

 

To modernise Australian business registers, the Australian government has introduced a new company director tracking system, the Director Identification Number (DIN). Once the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) confirms a person’s identity, they will receive a unique DIN. Importantly, directors keep this number permanently. As a result, a director will be able to use this number across multiple companies for each directorship they hold.

The DIN has received strong support from the Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC). They believe it will significantly benefit regulators and individuals doing business. Additionally, it will help provide greater security and modernise the way director information is collected. This article will explain how the company director tracking system works in Australia.

Individuals who are currently a director or will be acting as a director in the future must apply for a DIN. The Australian Business Registry Services (ABRS) will be responsible for introducing and maintaining the DIN regime.

The DIN Regime

The DIN regime has commenced with a transitional period applying from 1 November 2021. Notably, with the commencement of the DIN regime, the following applies:

existing directors will need to apply for a DIN by 30 November 2022;

new directors appointed between 1 November 2021 and 4 April 2022 will be required to apply within 28 days of their appointment; and

new directors appointed from 5 April 2022 will need to apply for a DIN before their appointment.

The table below outlines key dates you should note.

All directors, acting alternate directors and management committee members of ‘registered bodies’ will require a DIN. Registered bodies include companies and registered Australian bodies under the Corporations Act.

To apply for a DIN, visit the ABRS website.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the company director tracking system?

The Australian government has introduced a new tracking system, the Director Identification Number to modernise Australian business registers. Accordingly, a director will be able to use this number across multiple companies for each directorship they hold.

Why do you need a DIN?

The Federal Government wants to prevent the use of fraudulent or false director identities, in particular, illegal phoenixing, a widespread issue in Australia. Phoenixing occurs when a company is liquidated, abandoned or wound up to avoid paying its debts, and the same group of people start a new company.

What do you need to do?

You can apply for your DIN from 1 November 2021. If you are becoming a director, you can apply before your appointment. The law provides a clear timeframe for when you need to apply.

Why is the DIN being introduced?

Before the DIN regime, ASIC did not verify the identity of directors. Likewise, there was limited transparency of relationships between directors and multiple companies. Also, directors may have multiple records within ASIC systems. The new company director tracking system promotes good governance and significantly improves data security.

I am a company director. Is it compulsory for me to comply with the new tracking system?

All directors, acting alternate directors and management committee members of ‘registered bodies’ will require a DIN. Further, there will be significant civil and criminal penalties for directors who do not comply.

https://www.ikeep.com.au/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

It’s 2024 fringe benefits tax (FBT) time!

  As the 2024 fringe benefits tax (FBT) period approaches, it’s essential to note key dates and obligations. Employers who have provided fringe benefits to their employees or their associates between April 1, 2023, and March 31, 2024, are required to lodge and pay their 2024 FBT returns promptly.  Notable dates to remember include: The conclusion of the 2024 FBT year on March 31, 2024. The deadline for lodging FBT returns and settling any outstanding liabilities to avoid penalties and interest is May 21. For electronic lodgments through tax practitioners, the due date for lodging and payment is June 25. Employers new to lodging with a tax practitioner must ensure inclusion on their FBT client list by May 21 to be eligible for the June lodgment and payment timeline. Even if no FBT return is necessary, registered employers must inform the Australian Taxation crucial, the ATO recognizes exceptional circumstances and encourages proactive communication for those experie...
Read more

Managing Cashflow for Small Business

  Any business owner will tell you that managing business cashflow can be a real juggling act. Cashflow is one of the most common problems that cause business owners to lose sleep. Gaining control of your small business’ cashflow will go a long way to improving your peace of mind and reducing stress. So  how Can a Business Improve its Cashflow ? Identify Identifying certain triggers in particular sales and payments will make a significant difference to cashflow management. Analysing outgoing payments and noting when they regularly occur will go a long way to ensure strong cashflow. Some of the key areas to consider are: Payroll for staff Supplier payment terms and conditions Australian Tax Office Utilities Finance including bank fees and loans Rent Payment to suppliers Customer payments including refund policies There are number of business costs that must be accounted for to help create better cashflow management for your small business. Becoming aw...
Read more

Federal Court Decision on Employer’s Failure to Pay Annual Leave Entitlements

  The Federal Court of Australia recently ruled on a case involving an employer’s failure to pay a worker’s accrued annual leave entitlements upon termination, underscoring the importance of compliance with the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) and the severe repercussions of non-compliance. Case Background The case focused on the worker’s claims that the employer had dismissed him for exercising his “workplace rights,” imposed unreasonable working hours, and failed to pay his accrued entitlements upon termination. The court found the employer in breach of section 90(2) of the Fair Work Act for not paying the worker the amount equivalent to his accrued but untaken annual leave when his employment ended on December 9, 2021. The owed amount of $8,022.82 was paid only on March 30, 2022, nearly three months after the termination. Seriousness of Breaching the NES The court emphasized the seriousness of breaching the National Employment Standards (NES), stating that “any breach of the NES...
Read more